EDGE (EDGE)

$0.9236  +32.95%  24H

Social Sentiment Index (SSI)

Market Pulse Ranking (MPR)

X Posts

  • onchainschool.pro OnChain_Analyst Educator B
     6.45K  @how2onchain

    $EDGEX : TRANSFER TO THE EXCHANGE More than $1M was transferred from the team wallet to Bybit. Before that, an hour ago, there was a transfer of $100K to Gate. These may not be the last transfers. Be careful, they can also draw a manipulation, as is often the case. https://t.co/8nftKmUvMf

    onchainschool.pro OnChain_Analyst Educator B
     6.45K  @how2onchain

    Wallet: 0x5cbE2dda520e744C87A080b01394F57F7d29cc3c

     6  1  168
    Original >
    Trend of EDGE after release
     Bearish
    The EDGE team wallet transferred over $1.3 million to Bybit and Gate exchanges; the author warns of possible manipulation risk.
  • Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    edgeX is going to recover the loss from the farming?! - total bullshit Sarah（TraderX）.edge : First of all, thank you to the Korean community for your attention, discussion, and feedback over the past few days. We have been dealing with many things at the same time, and our responses were not timely enough. I sincerely apologize for that. Today, I want to directly address the questions the community cares about most. 1）Regarding the 14.16% of tokens This portion was allocated to market making partners and large Vault LPs who participated from the Points season through the XP season. To be clear, this 14.16% came from the overall 30% incentive pool. For any perp DEX, market makers and Vault LPs are part of the ecosystem, and edgeX is no exception. --------------------------------------------------- Here's my opinion Bullshit Festival Whether they deducted 14.16% or whatever the f*ck they took, they fixed the MM/VC/Vault LP allocation and just subtracted it from the user pool. 1. The real problem is that

    Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    2）Regarding why these addresses claimed at TGE and were then locked These partners were not originally meant to enter circulation at TGE, and they were also willing to support EDGE with long term holding. However, because EDGE needed to be listed on CEXs, the platforms required disclosure around circulation and also recommended at least a 1 year lock to reduce actual sell pressure on TGE day. That is why we first completed the onchain claim and then executed the lockup. ---------------------------------------------------- 2. Sure, lockups might sound nice, but the main issue is that they got their fixed quantities while users got slashed to 2~3 times less. This is diluting tactic #2.

    Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    3）Regarding why we listed on centralized platforms If EDGE only traded on edgeX, then most of the buying, selling, and turnover would still come from existing users on the platform. Listing on more venues means more holders, more traders, and broader liquidity. In the current market, we want EDGE to reach beyond our existing user base. ------------------------------------------------------- 3. CEX listing. Nice job. So what? It has zero to do with the distribution problem. It’s just an explanation, nothing more.

    Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    4）Regarding the buyback address The current buyback is completed within the trading system, and the purchased tokens are then transferred to a multisig wallet for management. Because EDGE was first issued on Ethereum, what everyone is seeing now is mainly the record on Etherscan. In any case, people can see the balance in the main contract decreasing and the balance in the buyback wallet increasing. These repurchased tokens will later be handled according to the community vote result. ----------------------------------------------------- 4. They’re not doing any buybacks. Period. They deposited USDC into two wallet but there’s zero USDC transfer and zero Trade records — so where the hell is the money coming from and how are they even doing buybacks? Evidence: https://t.co/NCHqqp4obJ

    Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    5）Regarding why the 50M from treasury has not been fully used yet At the moment, the buyback size is still relatively small, and the fee income in the spot account has not yet been fully used. We are prioritizing buybacks with that revenue first, and treasury funds will continue to be used afterward. ----------------------------------------------------- 5. It’s not “all used” — they didn’t use even 1%. They’re just moving EDGE that was already sitting in other accounts. Claiming “everything has been used” is diluting tactic #3.

    Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    6）Regarding Sodam Sodam is a team member and is not responsible for the points allocation. I have seen the attacks and threats directed at her, and that has been very upsetting. Please do not harass team members who are not directly responsible. If you have questions about allocation, buybacks, or lockups, you can come directly to me. ------------------------------------------------------ 6. This one’s also actually funny — they set her up as scapegoats and told people not to attack them. Of course no one should do personal attacks or over-the-top insults, but they created a situation where no one can get any answers. There’s only one inquiry representative, deposits/withdrawals barely work, no answers on distribution, frustration keeps piling up… yet they say the person in charge exists, but the founder says she has “no direct responsibility.” Give me a break…

    Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    7）Regarding the allocation controversy We acknowledge that we were not clear or transparent enough in our disclosure, and this is something we must improve. In the actual distribution, referral points and Vault points were weighted lower than points from direct trading. At the same time, we did not reduce all low quality participation to zero. But regardless, these rules were not communicated clearly enough, and that responsibility is ours. If the final value of your allocation does not even cover the fees you actually paid, please send me a direct message and we will review it case by case. ------------------------------------------------- 7. This is peak bullshit diluting. What the hell is the standard for “final distribution value”? what if they sold? what if they bought back? How are you supposed to judge that?! If they’re going to do it, it should be a clear system-wide rule based on a specific price and applied to everyone — not “case-by-case review.” Starting with Google Form submissions is already

    Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    8）Regarding expectations and market performance I understand that many people had high expectations for edgeX. But the current market environment is weak, and around TGE we had to make tradeoffs between lower circulation, stronger price support, and broader distribution. That does not mean every decision was perfect, but these were practical decisions made under real market conditions. ------------------------------------------------------- 8. “Yep, we raised the price so what now?”… by cutting user circulating supply. ????

    Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    9）Regarding what comes next The team will keep building, and we will continue to provide more explanation where needed. If you are disappointed, I am sorry. If you are still willing to watch edgeX going forward, we will prove ourselves through action. And again, if the value of your airdrop is lower than the fees you actually paid, please contact me directly. Finally, I want to thank the Korean community for your long term support of edgeX. You have given us patience, time, and trust through both good times and difficult moments, and we will always remember that. I also want to especially thank the Korean ambassadors and Sodam for their continued efforts and support for the community. No matter whether you are supportive, questioning, or disappointed right now, we respect these genuine voices. Thank you again to the Korean community for staying with us. ------------------------------------------------------ I bet there's over 98% chance of the so-called buyback isn’t actually happening. They’re just MM’i

     1  1  67
    Original >
    Trend of EDGE after release
     Extremely Bearish
    EDGE buyback not implemented, allocation opaque, users' token value impaired
  • Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    edgeX says they will refund money if the airdrop loss is higher than the fees?! - Nonsense Below is a translated summary First of all, thank you to the Korean community for the interest, discussion, and feedback over the past few days. At the same time, we apologize sincerely for not responding quickly enough while handling many tasks. Today we will directly explain the parts that the community is most curious about. 1) About the 14.16% tokens This amount is allocated to market‑making partners and large Vault LPs who participated from the Points Season through the XP Season. To be clear, this 14.16% comes from the overall 30% incentive pool. Just like all Perp DEXs, market makers and Vault LPs are part of the ecosystem, and edgeX is no exception. 2) Why these addresses were locked after claiming at TGE These partners were not originally scheduled to enter circulation at TGE and were willing to support EDGE with long‑term holding. However, to list on a CEX, the circulating supply needs to be disclosed, and the exchange recommended at least a one‑year lock‑up to reduce actual sell pressure. Thus we completed the on‑chain claim first, then proceeded with the lock‑up. 3) Reason for listing on a centralized exchange (CEX) If EDGE were only traded on edgeX, buying, selling, and trading would be limited mostly to existing users. Listing on more exchanges allows us to attract more holders and traders, expanding liquidity. In the current market situation, expanding beyond existing users to a broader market is important. 4) About the buy‑back address Currently the buy‑back is carried out within the trading system, and the purchased tokens are later transferred to a multi‑sig wallet for management. Since EDGE was first issued on Ethereum, most records are visible on Etherscan. In any case, the main contract balance decreases while the buy‑back wallet balance increases. These purchased tokens will be dealt with according to community voting results. 5) Why the treasury's 50 million tokens have not been fully used yet The current buy‑back scale is still relatively small, and the fee revenue generated from the spot account has not been fully utilized. We are first using that revenue for buy‑backs, and will sequentially use treasury funds thereafter. 6) Regarding Sodam Sodam is a team member but does not handle point distribution. We have seen attacks and threats toward her and find it very regrettable. Please refrain from harassing a team member who has no direct responsibility. If you have questions about distribution, buy‑back, or lock‑up, contact me directly. 7) About the distribution controversy We acknowledge that our information disclosure was not sufficiently clear and transparent, which must be improved. In the actual distribution, the weighting of referral points and Vault points was applied lower than that of direct trade points. We also did not set all low‑quality participation to zero. However, the fact that these criteria were not clearly communicated is entirely our responsibility. If the final distribution value is actually lower than the fees you paid, DM me and we will review each case. 8) Expectations and market conditions We understand many had high expectations for edgeX. But the current market environment is poor, and at TGE we had to choose between reducing circulation, defending price, and broader distribution. Not every decision was perfect, but they were realistic judgments given the actual market conditions. 9) Future direction The team will continue development and will keep providing additional explanations where needed. We are sorry if you are disappointed. Still, please keep watching edgeX and we will prove ourselves with actions. Again, if the airdrop value is lower than the fees you paid, contact us directly. Finally, thank the Korean community for supporting edgeX over the long term. We will always remember the patience, time, and trust you have given both in good and difficult times. Also special thanks to Korean ambassadors and Sodam for their continued effort and community support. Whether you are supportive, doubtful, or disappointed, we respect every sincere voice. Thank you again for being with us. --------------------------------------------------------- Feast of Nonsense 1. Whether you subtract the 14.16% or anything else, the MM/VC/Vault LP allocation was fixed and taken from the user pool. The problem is that each point yields a different token ratio – water‑flood 1. 2. Lock‑up can be seen as good, but the main issue is they received a fixed amount while users lost 2–3 times the amount – water‑flood 2. 3. CEX listing – well done. So what? It has nothing to do with distribution issues. It’s just an explanation. 4. No buy‑back is happening. There is neither USDC movement nor trade records in the wallet that deposited USDC. How are they buying back and with what money? 5. Not a single token has been used; they are only moving EDGE they held in another account. Claiming that none have been used is water‑flood 3. 6. It’s also funny that the team labels them as scapegoats and tells them not to act. While it’s understandable to avoid personal attacks or extreme profanity, they created a situation where inquiries can’t be answered, there’s only one contact channel, deposits/withdrawals are problematic, there’s no answer on distribution, frustration builds, yet there is a person in charge, but the team says there’s no "direct responsibility" – that’s odd. 7. This is pure nonsense water‑flood. What is the standard for "final distribution value"? Sold? Bought again? Can we judge? If not case‑by‑case, it should be handled by a system with a specific price benchmark; even starting with a Google Form is an error. Again, whether you made a loss or profit, before that the distribution was not as before (point 1), and the lack of buy‑back is point 2 – water‑flood 4. 8. "Yes, we wanted to push the price up"… by cutting user circulation. ????? Over 98% of the alleged buy‑backs never happened; MM is manipulating retail on CEX. There is no $200M net profit, yet they pretend it exists and act as if buy‑backs are happening. If concrete evidence proves ParGu is wrong, we will give them a massive grand slam. But fundamentally, the account that deposited $50M USDC shows no USDC withdrawals, no purchases, no trade records, and no EDGE withdrawals. Even if their Explorer lacks "price and quantity" info, it does show SPOT_TRADE and SPOT_IN / SPOT_OUT records. Otherwise, the claim is that after publicly putting $50M into edgeX, the remaining $xM from CEX is used for buy‑back, then sent to a SAFE address. Why do that? After depositing $50M, why add more? Also… they moved money from another entity’s Amber wallet, not directly from Treasury, and after putting it into Bybit, they withdrew again… It all feels like deception. At least there is evidence.

    Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    Nonsense ramblings.... 1. How much fee was spent? To calculate this you need the entire CSV and sum it up. It’s very difficult for high‑frequency traders. 2. It's called a 'fee'. Even if directional loss exists, loss from spread/slippage is not counted. The calculation itself is hard, the criteria are vague, and it's a Google Form. The intent may be good, but the current problem is that the token amount was not properly given, and they are using weird tactics for "water‑flood". The biggest issue is that MM is boosting price to lure retail, and everyone stays silent. Of course, price is the most important factor for a Web3 project, but after stabbing the back, they then apply ointment saying "it's for you"… is that right? After cutting the supply in half or thirds, they claim they will make it "loss‑free" for you?!?!? According to the original calculation, ParGu was profitable from $750M, but is still at a 36% loss. So will they only take the fee portion to cover the loss?

     8  1  680
    Original >
    Trend of EDGE after release
     Extremely Bearish
    The tweet author accuses the edgeX project of deceiving users in airdrops and buybacks.
  • Game TA_Analyst Trader B
     44.76K  @game_for_one

    Took a position in Edge (edgeX). Don't think many have dug into it yet apart from it being a "new" coin, tldr thesis: Real circulating supply is closer to 15% once you account for insider/team allocations at TGE (circ was 35% but 15-20% went to some interesting wallets).. Not necessarily bearish if they're running it up, insiders are unlikely to exit this early. Buyback is aggressive, $1M in 24h against a real circ mcap of ~$60M is a meaningful bid. People loved the Hype buybacks, good narrative fit. They had ~$200M in stables in treasury. $50M just moved onto the exchange almost certainly for more buybacks. More to come. + you have Binance, Upbit and Bithumb listings to look forward to.

    Game TA_Analyst Trader B
     44.76K  @game_for_one

    will probably move all the trading ideas into telegram from now on and keep X for other thoughts. https://t.co/JFX8tQk1Up

     53  15  7.25K
    Original >
    Trend of EDGE after release
     Extremely Bullish
    EDGE is extremely bullish due to aggressive buybacks, low circulating supply, and potential exchange listings.
  • Zach Humphries TA_Analyst Trader B
     136.78K  @ZachHumphries

    And $EDGE is almost in the Top 100. Been working alongside this team well before the token dropped. Good to see them doing well. Deep dive video coming soon! @edgeX_exchange Use my link sign up to new PERP dex taking space by storm. https://t.co/XQM8vH8gLG https://t.co/y5HzkW35KA

     121  0  15.17K
    Original >
    Trend of EDGE after release
     Extremely Bullish
    The EDGE token is performing well, its price has risen 78.19%, and it is about to enter the top 100 by market cap.
  • Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    edgeX is not doing any buybacks The $50M deposit came from Amber Group’s Safe wallet and EOA. Safe: https://t.co/mZPi6a8c9Q EOA: https://t.co/3qubZhXMRf However, when you check the edge chain, there are no Trade records at all. https://t.co/r4yE9pXSX3 https://t.co/d5UyCTbbu0 For reference, when I check my own wallet address, any actual trade shows up as SPOT_TRADE. The only thing visible on the 47be wallet is SPOT_IN, which only appears for internal airdrops or transfers. Conclusion: These criminals are not doing buybacks at all. Even if they claim they are, the wallet that pulled $50M out of the Treasury and deposited it definitely didn’t execute any buyback on the edge chain. And even if they're withdrawing the EDGE they did buyback internally inside edge, there should still be records — but there are none on those wallets at all

    Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    USDC Deposit Record on edge Change Amount TXID 6,000,000 0x60ca9112a90f24f16af3b3b59f4b1796cc5811d93f18ae280da37ee76fa4696a 9,000,000 0x654947ba33e4e07dcb1bd10364f0659a307c81040768ab72869ed309d1d5d123 9,000,000 0xe7a20d2cf960875790c2b1b894f5dc59770d42e6afd314b9146c48f790f8d0d6 1,000,000 0x348dc77410d39ba60c28fd407659a141db3909034b742d6480bb7d1b937c81b9 5,000,000 0x5b2ef47be9a90a09c41218e304e1c34a41ddd0bdfeff9aebc79d4d3628a928eb 7,000,000 0x72a392ca2229d19852af2af3bfbc3aafcba438ec7ef791f4278efac04f5d7738 10,000,000 0xc8dbbd0ba2df6ad3d26b45f9a78056a15739ae468df43203e4915c8e20df5800 2,999,990 0xd5979c409d8ba4bcf04efd71d2feb8065c407a1ffd1ed0a02c8c5867770b160e Total 49,999,990

     0  2  634
    Original >
    Trend of EDGE after release
     Extremely Bearish
    edgeX is accused of not performing the promised buybacks, on-chain records show no actual trades, suspected fraud.
  • Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    LOL 'Please enter edgeX UID' Well... it's somewhat reasonable But the very idea of voting on this is absurd And doing it via a Google Form as well Really... impressive, Edge! https://t.co/Jhz7kC8RoX

    Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    This is something said by edgeX founder (Sarah) Due to automatic translation, 'once' was mistakenly rendered as 'a day', The amount currently claimed to have been bought back is 1.4M EDGE, approximately $962K The buy‑back dashboard is also odd, it links to the 'current' price instead of the price at the time, so the total buy‑back amount changes with the price This... uh... And they say 'some funds were deposited to a CEX for purchase', but why not put it into https://t.co/bPk4aYLIGZ? Currently, edgeX's Spot Treasury holds 27.3M EDGE https://t.co/h2YtClcTlh If they truly are doing a buy‑back, given the current trend, at the same price, within 20 days the EDGE in Edge would become zero. Of course they could bring more from elsewhere. Well... also... putting the bought‑back amount into a SAFE is normally not a big deal, but at this time it raises a 'why?' question. Moved from left hand to right hand, but burning it would be a waste?!

     3  0  577
    Original >
    Trend of EDGE after release
     Extremely Bearish
    The edgeX token buy‑back process has been accused of being non‑transparent and involving suspicious activities, sparking strong community skepticism.
  •  TA_Analyst Trader C
     261.69K  @

    $EDGE I think that EdgeX crime pumps this coin at least once before it dies horribly. Not in it, just watching https://t.co/pcAwU9bgjD

     18  5  3.36K
    Original >
    Trend of EDGE after release
     Extremely Bearish
    Author predicts EDGE will ultimately crash, but may see a short-term pump; author not participating.
  • Paguinfo DeFi_Expert Educator C
     3.23K  @NewPaguinfo

    edgeX is not doing buybacks. The $50M deposit was made from Amber Group's Safe wallet and EOA. 0xab57b993ecbb2be0747bc2f38257fabf369847be (Safe) 0xe11970f2f3de9d637fb786f2d869f8fea44195ac/history (EOA) But there are no trade records on the edge chain. For reference, looking at my wallet address, If a trade had been made, it would appear as SPOT_TRADE. Only the 47be wallet shows SPOT_IN, which would occur if there were an airdrop or transfer within edge. Conclusion: These guys are not doing buybacks. Even if they claim to, they have not taken money from the Treasury to deposit $50M into the stated wallet. Even if a transfer was made inside edge, there should be a record, but there isn’t. Check the links and records below 👇🧵

     33  8  7.02K
    Original >
    Trend of EDGE after release
     Extremely Bearish
    The author alleges that the edgeX project team did not conduct the $50 million token buyback, and on-chain data shows no trades.
  • ICO Analytics #StandWithUkraine 🇺🇦 Media FA_Analyst C
     139.51K  @ICO_Analytics

    A look back at the digital assets launched in March 2026, sorted by fully diluted valuation. $edge $bsb $btw $opn $prl $bp $kat $based $dual $idos https://t.co/f8P24i8kYY

     28  1  3.80K
    Original >
    Trend of EDGE after release
     Neutral
    In the March 2026 new token FDV ranking, EDGE tops with a $713 million fully diluted valuation.