Blast (BLAST)

$0.000439  -1.79%  24H

Indice de Sentiment Social (SSI)

Classement du Pouls du Marché (MPR)

Publications X

  • cryptoleon Quant Trader C
     42.70K  @cryptoleon

    genuinely there is like 0% interesting crypto content to make right now we had blast which was super exciting then we had memecoins we had abstract but I need something new something like blast pls pls pac come back

     104  60  2.42K
    Lire l'original >
    Tendance de BLAST après le lancement
     Haussier
    Looking forward to BLAST's return, calling for PAC's comeback
  • wyck 📴 Founder Educator C
     228.27K  @wyckoffweb

    Without exaggerating, I think most projects are guilty of this. They announce: “50% to the community.” Then at TGE, they airdrop 3%, and the remaining 47% sits in a team-controlled wallet. Here are some cases: - Blast: Promised 50%, delivered 17% at TGE and nothing since. - Cysic: Promised 0.5% for yappers, gave 0.2% and said nothing about the rest. - Redstone: Promised 9.5%, gave 5% (+ small compensation later). - Catizen: Promised 43%, gave 15% in the first season and that’s all. - Starknet: Promised 9%, gave 7% allocated (less actually claimed). - Towns: Promised 10%, gave 3% to actual early users. There should be another I think. - EigenLayer: Promised 15%, gave 5% in the first season and cancelled “season two.” And until people start tracking this properly, teams will keep getting away with it.

    Zun D
     42.55K  @Zun2025

    the biggest scam in tokenomics is not the team allocation it is the "community allocation" that never gets distributed 40% on paper, 2% in reality, 38% sitting in a team controlled wallet u got played by a pie chart

     173  45  17.62K
    Lire l'original >
    Tendance de BLAST après le lancement
     Baissier
    Most projects allocate only about 2% to the community in reality, with the majority held by the team, constituting a serious scam.
  • Mike Dudas VC Tokenomics_Expert B
     285.30K  @mdudas

    blast has more stablecoins on the chain than @Stable https://t.co/U7w5l65A62

     28  6  4.69K
    Lire l'original >
    Tendance de BLAST après le lancement
     Neutre
    Blast's on-chain stablecoin market cap surpasses Stable, showing its advantage in the stablecoin ecosystem.
  • IcoBeast.eth🦇🔊 Influencer Trader B
     68.90K  @icobeast

    Related - I might have too many BLAST tokens. -75% exit price impact 💀💀😭 https://t.co/dYZGLXfF7a

    IcoBeast.eth🦇🔊 Influencer Trader B
     68.90K  @icobeast

    Best chart in all of crypto today https://t.co/wr88FcWWgZ

     143  64  27.72K
    Lire l'original >
    Tendance de BLAST après le lancement
     Extrêmement baissier
    BLAST token faced a -75% price impact, the project withdrew funding, the team abandoned it, and users are in despair.
  • Tola Joseph Fadugbagbe FA_Analyst Educator C
     280.27K  @connectwithtola

    What happened to $BLAST? My over $3000 now $52. Sigh! https://t.co/f08lOvZW88

     111  34  10.49K
    Lire l'original >
    Tendance de BLAST après le lancement
     Extrêmement baissier
    The BLAST token fell from $3000 to $52, and the author is frustrated.
  • wyck 📴 Founder Educator C
     228.27K  @wyckoffweb

    It genuinely feels like Blast forgot they’re supposed to be building a chain. Last post on X is September 2025. Not even a “Happy New Year” for the community. Meanwhile: • $29M market cap token • $3M 24h volume • $414 in 24h chain fees Is anyone even using it? https://t.co/gaoSAMfcPt

     81  34  7.82K
    Lire l'original >
    Tendance de BLAST après le lancement
     Extrêmement baissier
    The author questions the activity and usage of the Blast chain, pointing out that its social media is not updated and on-chain fees are extremely low.
  • Crypto Jargon Trader TA_Analyst C
     73.90K  @Crypto_Jargon

    If you invested $10,000 in $BLAST at the top, you would have around $170 left today. At this point, Blast should rebrand itself to Bust. 💀 https://t.co/AThKO6u4eC

     15  5  3.43K
    Lire l'original >
    Tendance de BLAST après le lancement
     Extrêmement baissier
    YFI and BLAST plunged from their peaks, causing investors heavy losses.
  • Angelo Influencer Trader B
     19.06K  @angelodotsui

    If you invested $10,000 in Blast in 2024, today you would have $116 https://t.co/NYUuob8OHK

     120  30  7.17K
    Lire l'original >
    Tendance de BLAST après le lancement
     Extrêmement baissier
    The Blast token price plummeted more than 98%, investors suffered heavy losses, and the author’s tone is sarcastic.
  • wale.moca 🐳 Influencer Trader B
     172.96K  @waleswoosh

    I think this is a popular take. CT is so boring right now that this could take the timeline by storm. Remember Blast?

    wale.moca 🐳 Influencer Trader B
     172.96K  @waleswoosh

    Blast farming was a lot more fun than the chart suggests https://t.co/XWbaBzAeKp

     256  124  20.10K
    Lire l'original >
    Tendance de BLAST après le lancement
     Extrêmement baissier
    Blast token price has crashed over 98%, chart shows a sustained downward trend.
  • defizard DeFi_Expert Educator C
     60.85K  @belizardd

    "Someone is still using @blast and @Cardano?..." Yes, my dear friend... they have 1.1K & 11.6K active daily addresses respectively... https://t.co/37BmbWHYgl

    aaalex.hl D
     16.82K  @aaalexhl

    Aster has SIX daily active users and they're all either CZ or Binance employees Read that again They have SIX active users on their platform Pretty sure Cardano and probably Blast has more active users https://t.co/zvBjMHC6K9

     7  2  782
    Lire l'original >
    Tendance de BLAST après le lancement
     Extrêmement baissier
    The tweet questions Aster project's real activity by comparing daily active users, pointing out that its user base is very small.