7.0K @Greenpeace06_09 Here for the money.... That's it. They don't care that scammers are behind this ... They have zero interactions with the community.
@binance ... They do not deserve your coins. You can do so much better. Maybe someone who actually cares about this community and chain and won't vote yes to a proposal that is controlled by scammers.
Very disappointed.
$lunc
#GreenpeaceUNITED
43
4
2.9K
11.8K @TerraNewsEN 
25.7K @TerraHaberTr Binance's next $LUNC burns will take place tomorrow. The announced burn amount might be slightly lower than last month's. However, Binance has been carrying out $LUNC burns for over three years—a fact that serves as a testament to the exchange's support for the Terra Classic community.
#LUNC #TerraClassic #Binance
75
0
3.3K
122.5K @MrDiamondhandz1 terra-luna:native army and validators please think carefully how you vote to prop #12222 Hyperlane bridge.
This could open Terra Luna Classic for exploits, and bridges have been exploited in cosmos for millions this year.
For this initiative, no security measures have been implemented and no independent audits have been performed. Developer and community support has been withdrawn, leaving the project now dependent on a single validator for its continued operation and maintenance.
Protecting the blockchain must be priority #1 and in its current state this proposal shows no methods to achieve safety and security.
Protect our users! 💎🤲🏻 #LUNC
3.5K @LunaClassicDAO LunaClassic Community,
Proposal #12222
Why this poses a real security threat to our chain? Simple I’ll explain below 👇
Bridge and IBC integrations expand the attack surface dramatically because they involve complex interactions between on-chain logic, off-chain relayers/validators, and cross-chain messaging.
Historical bridge exploits show the pattern clearly:
• The Ronin Bridge lost $624 million when attackers compromised a majority of validators (via phishing), allowing them to drain escrowed assets.
• Wormhole lost $320 million when a flaw in signature/guardian verification allowed minting wrapped tokens with no underlying collateral.
These are not isolated! bridges have accounted for billions in cumulative losses, often through validator/relayer compromises, missing security checks after upgrades, or logic errors that let attackers fake deposits or drain reserves.
IBC-specific risks in Cosmos ecosystems are also documented. The 2022 Dragonberry vulnerability in the ICS-23 proof specification a
45
6
3.0K
