Ethereum Name Service (ENS)

$4.066  -2.89%  24H

社交熱度指數(SSI)

市場預警排名(MPR)

相關推文

  • 토큰포스트 - TokenPost Korea Media Influencer D
     5.73K  @tokenpostkr

    ENS co-founder exercises veto power, rejects the Security Council extension… community backlash https://t.co/V1WlN5mWzP https://t.co/qJj7KySqIh

     0  0  36
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ENS走勢
     看跌
    ENS co-founder vetoed the Security Council extension, sparking strong community backlash.
  • 吴说区块链 Media Educator D
     177.62K  @wublockchain12

    ENS DAO co‑founder Nick Johnson cast a dissenting vote in an on‑chain executable ballot, causing the proposal to extend the ENS Security Council’s term by two years to be rejected with about 82% opposition. Johnson holds roughly 3.26 million ENS tokens, accounting for about 80% of the tokens voted in this poll. He said his opposition stems from the possibility that current Security Council members could use veto power to block proposals they personally disagree with, and he supports a new proposal to restructure the Security Council. The incident sparked community debate over the concentration of governance power and voting rights within ENS, with some members even suggesting that ENS DAO is facing a risk of governance failure. (The Block) https://t.co/7ICW39MoWi

     0  1  1.27K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ENS走勢
     看跌
    ENS governance proposal rejected, community concerned about excessive concentration of power
  • 𝗵𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿 Community_Lead Media B
     15.56K  @BFreshHB

    who's gonna make a biopic for the rise, fall, then rise again of @BrantlyMillegan irt @ensdomains

     10  4  364
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ENS走勢
     中性
    ENS may strengthen again after volatility
  • Coinage ♻️ Media Influencer B
     33.43K  @coinage_media
    brantly.eth D
     53.23K  @BrantlyMillegan

    the moral and usage implosion of ENS is a catastrophe for Ethereum https://t.co/J9uP8FPxFy

     242  31  24.54K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ENS走勢
     極度看跌
    The moral and usage implosion of ENS is a catastrophe for Ethereum, with active names continuously declining.
  • f1go.eth FA_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     6.77K  @FigoETH
    Lefteris Karapetsas D
     72.57K  @LefterisJP

    ENS governance explained. vote: Should the DAO send its treasury to ENS Labs? ▓░░░░░░░░░ 2% - Yes ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░ 98% - No Nick: but I like money *votes Yes* ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░ 99% - Yes ▓░░░░░░░░░ 1% - No

     247  11  8.56K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ENS走勢
     中性
    ENS governance vote 98% rejected, author sarcastically supports
  • materkel.eth 🦇🔊 FA_Analyst Influencer A
     5.85K  @materkel

    So... who wants to crowdfund a DAO to take ownership of ENS? 😈

     24  4  1.48K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ENS走勢
     中性
    ENS may be acquired by a DAO, need to watch governance risks
  • materkel.eth 🦇🔊 FA_Analyst Influencer A
     5.85K  @materkel

    ENS = governance token, for governance over the DAO treasury => tokenholders decide what happens with the DAO treasury Yes, ENS is a governance token, but tokenholders are still entitled to a governance vote on what happens with the treasury, which could lead to revenue being distributed or used for buybacks... so the proposal entitled tokenholders to decide what happens with the revenue. What am I missing here?

    nick.eth D
     93.58K  @nicksdjohnson

    @_esk_kse_ That proposal entitled *the DAO* to receive revenue from ENS registrations. Not *tokenholders*.

     13  2  2.37K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ENS走勢
     中性
    ENS governance token decides DAO treasury revenue distribution, author questions proposal target
  • z80.wei 👌☀️👌 Dev Security_Expert B
     8.22K  @0xz80

    ENS is literally one of the few projects our industry has produced in the past 10 years that has actual PMF and it could just run profitably on autopilot forever why are they setting it on fire

     134  13  7.68K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ENS走勢
     看漲
    ENS has genuine market demand and a promising outlook
  • f1go.eth FA_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     6.77K  @FigoETH
    Lefteris Karapetsas D
     72.57K  @LefterisJP

    Absolutely to nobody's surprise Nick used 50% of the voting supply to vote down the onchain proposal to renew the Security council despite having abstained the offchain vote Can't let that sweet ~$500m go to anybody else than him and his company! And with that ENS DAO is dead https://t.co/FOYNblG953

     511  58  106.77K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ENS走勢
     極度看跌
    Nick.eth abused voting power to veto the ENS DAO Security Council renewal proposal, and the author pessimistically states that the ENS DAO is dead.
  • f1go.eth FA_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     6.77K  @FigoETH
    _gabrielShapir0 D
     77.60K  @lex_node

    I can't believe ENS, of all things, has turned into another heist and grift. Is nothing sacred? The reasons given--DAOs are dysfunctional, etc.--are all true in general but pretty much irrelevant in this case as DAO simply controls treasury and has funded Labs with whatever it wants. It's just purely a money grab and after this, there will be zero accountability of the team to anyone as that is how lawyers set up these ridiculous "foundations". As I always warned, the "constitutions" sound good but are unenforceable as they don't give any tokenholders or anyone else any right to sue if they are arguably violated. The crypto "space" or "industry" is completely lost and it's really so depressing.

     328  53  16.19K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後ENS走勢
     看跌
    ENS is accused of fund plundering, with bleak prospects.