Analysoor (ZERO)

Seems everything is fine, but there's one thing.

$ZERO 9.38M
EmcxFTNVDqyLHp11NvwvLZ4D7LKGbG9i7B8RF7dwpump

Project created as alternative to centralized AI: privacy, no censorship, resilience to downtime and data center monopoly.

I, by the way, basically tested this model as a user. Asked several dozen complex tricky questions and 95% of answers were correct. In terms of product, what I see in the browser is quite decent.

Developer can be researched independently and conclusions drawn @leyten

Visible chunk of onchain distribution looks normal.

Biggest red flag I see is the set of KOLs and their positions on side wallets. I just don't understand what they're doing in this project, not their thing. I hope they're not actually secretly heading this project.

Verified on Moonshot, not bad not good.

> Where I'm Parked on Meteora
Not the first day working with the token. Rebalance 1-2 times a day. Depending on expectations I choose different liquidity pool.

· If I expect sharp drop https://t.co/Tjpgij1NoA

· If I e

Decentralized AI compute is a notoriously fuck*ng unforgiving arena.

And there’s a reason most “distributed frontier model” dreams crashed and burned: latency.

Try sharding a 100B+ parameter model across a bunch of consumer GPUs scattered around the public internet and you don’t get magic, you get pain: single-digit tokens per second and a system that’s basically unusable.

So when @c0mputeAI says they’ve finally killed the latency bottleneck, and then locks in a partnership with @virtuals_io Protocol to serve as the compute layer for tokenized AI agents, I couldn’t not pay attention.

Is it actually as good as it sounds… and where’s the gotcha?

So here is my personal analysis.

---

➥ The Breakthrough: "Shard" Distributed Inference

To understand why c0mpute is interesting, you have to understand why decentralized AI inference has historically failed.

A single consumer GPU (like an RTX 4090) only has 24GB of VRAM, barely enough for an 8B-30B model. Running frontier models (e.g., 744B parameters) usually

Decentralized AI compute is a notoriously fuck*ng unforgiving arena.

And there’s a reason most “distributed frontier model” dreams crashed and burned: latency.

Try sharding a 100B+ parameter model across a bunch of consumer GPUs scattered around the public internet and you don’t get magic, you get pain: single-digit tokens per second and a system that’s basically unusable.

So when @c0mputeAI says they’ve finally killed the latency bottleneck, and then locks in a partnership with @virtuals_io Protocol to serve as the compute layer for tokenized AI agents, I couldn’t not pay attention.

Is it actually as good as it sounds… and where’s the gotcha?

So here is my personal analysis.

---

➥ The Breakthrough: "Shard" Distributed Inference

To understand why c0mpute is interesting, you have to understand why decentralized AI inference has historically failed.

A single consumer GPU (like an RTX 4090) only has 24GB of VRAM, barely enough for an 8B-30B model. Running frontier models (e.g., 744B parameters) usually