Near Protocol (NEAR)

$1.056  -1.58%  24H

Индекс социальных настроений (SSI)

Рейтинг пульса рынка (MPR)

Посты из X

  • Vadim OnChain_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     10.11K  @zacodil

    FastNear just dropped a new NEAR Explorer and the tech under the hood is genuinely impressive. ClickHouse backend (same OLAP engine used by Cloudflare, Uber) - meaning queries over massive blockchain datasets run in milliseconds, not seconds. The API clocks ~270ms latency for most requests What sets it apart from other exploreres: - Pluggable widget system for tx detail rendering - extensible by design - Intelligent tx batching (20 per request) with background prefetching - pages load before you even click - Cursor-based pagination instead of offset - stays fast on accounts with 100k+ transactions - Fully open source lightweight frontend Worth bookmarking! Link 👇

    Vadim OnChain_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     10.11K  @zacodil

    Real architectural gem https://t.co/zoFtHmtIqy

     16  1  531
    Оригинал >
    Тренд NEAR после выпуска
     Бычий
    NEAR Explorer delivers outstanding performance, with millisecond-level queries, worth attention
  • Vadim OnChain_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     10.11K  @zacodil

    The widget system in the new FastNEAR Explorer is a true architectural gem. Every transaction detail page runs through a widget registry - each widget has a match() function + priority, so multiple widgets can render the same tx simultaneously, sorted by specificity. Right now it's just a raw JSON viewer. But the design means anyone can write a widget that pattern-matches on receiver_id, method_name, or NEP-297 event logs and renders rich UI instead of raw data. Ref Finance swap? Show token logos + price impact. NFT sale? Render the artwork inline. Failed tx? Parse the error into human-readable explanation Imagine a community widget registry where every dApp ships their own transaction renderer. Your explorer stops being a generic block scanner and becomes a protocol-aware interface that actually understands what happened - not just what was called. Still WIP but already snappier than anything else on NEAR

    Evgeny Kuzyakov D
     19.87K  @ekuzyakov

    The goal is to make it both simple to understand for users and a powerful tool for developers. So far it's a bit more developer's focused, but we'll make improvements in the coming week https://t.co/bDUvWm8bva

     5  1  184
    Оригинал >
    Тренд NEAR после выпуска
     Бычий
    FastNEAR Explorer introduces an innovative widget system, enhancing readability of NEAR transaction data and developer experience.
  • Vadim OnChain_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     10.11K  @zacodil

    What most miss about crypto privacy: CZ nailed the core problem. Nobody wants their paycheck visible to every explorer on earth. But the industry keeps trying to bolt privacy onto chains designed to be transparent. That's patching, not solving. NEAR approached this differently from genesis - native account abstraction where one account holds multiple keys with scoped permissions. Named accounts for everyday use, implicit accounts when you need pseudonymity, function-call keys so dApps never touch your funds. Chain signatures via MPC mean no single node ever holds the full signing key during cross-chain transactions. Took me a while to realize: privacy isn't a feature you add later. It's an architectural choice. When users can choose their own exposure level per interaction, the whole privacy-vs-UX tradeoff starts looking like a false dilemma.

    CZ 🔶 BNB Founder Influencer C
     10.69M  @cz_binance

    (Lack of) Privacy may the missing link for crypto payments adoption. Imagine, a company pays employees in crypto on-chain. With the current state of crypto, you can pretty much see how much everyone in the company is paid (by clicking the from address). 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/LRmuPHuMMf

     9  0  318
    Оригинал >
    Тренд NEAR после выпуска
     Бычий
    NEAR native account abstraction enhances privacy, supporting on-chain payment adoption
  • Vini Barbosa |「 thecoding 」 Dev Educator B
     10.86K  @vinibarbosabr
    _gabrielShapir0 D
     76.91K  @lex_node

    relayers are centralized...not a bad thing per se but it's good to be informed what you're using (not sure how many people understand NEAR intents might kangaroo-court-seize your funds if TRM flags them but @vinibarbosabr has surfaced the issue well)...

     13  6  3.12K
    Оригинал >
    Тренд NEAR после выпуска
     Медвежий
    NEAR relayers are centralized, user funds may be frozen, be cautious
  • Vadim OnChain_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     10.11K  @zacodil

    The tech behind NEAR Intents is genuinely ahead of its time. Documentation and communication just need to catch up. That's how you build institutional-grade trust. Recent thread about 10 BTC frozen from an alleged Chinese darknet market operator using NEAR Intents brought this into focus. ZachXBT confirmed the guy was likely running FreeCity marketplace + laundering for DPRK. Justice served? Probably. But most users don't have a clear mental model of what happens to their assets at each layer of a cross-chain intent flow. When you deposit BTC into an intent-based system, what's custodial and what's trustless? Where are the trust assumptions? What can and can't happen to your funds in transit? What I'd love to see from intent-based systems in general: - Clear docs on custody model at each layer (bridge, solver, settlement) - Published compliance policies before users deposit - Which layer simply reverts suspicious deposits vs which one can freeze funds already in transit? - How do 1-click swap API and other integration APIs handle screening - can they serve as a verification layer before funds even enter the system? - Defined guarantees and SLAs for funds in transit - Roadmap toward minimizing trust assumptions over time All this case is an opportunity. The best protocols earn trust through radical transparency about their architecture.

    Vadim OnChain_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     10.11K  @zacodil

    Thread from ZachXBT https://t.co/PfTnffg3JJ

     33  3  582
    Оригинал >
    Тренд NEAR после выпуска
     Бычий
    NEAR cross-chain intent technology leads, but needs to improve custody transparency
  • Vini Barbosa |「 thecoding 」 Dev Educator B
     10.86K  @vinibarbosabr
    d3h3d (ZUD arc) 「🦑」 D
     8.78K  @d3h3d_

    i think that if you are running a service that takes custody of users’ assets there is a moral obligation (and a legal one, but this post was more on the moral aspect) to seize assets of people who are the scum of human kind, and this looks like on of those cases i would expect any service running on @ikadotxyz and chooses a custodial model (because you cannot do that with ika as well) to do the exact same, and i have no issue with what near did, it’s the right thing to do! the only difference is that with ika you CAN build a non-custodial cross-chain dex, in which the dex operators CAN’T seize assets even if they want to, plus ika is permissionless on the mpc level and way more decentralized, and has an imported key model as well, which makes any censorship on the mpc level either very hard / impossible (depending on the use case) on the bright side i hope this will at least finally settle the debate of whether near mpc is custodial, i hope @az_near and @jp_dawg and others who insisted that distributed =

     20  1  455
    Оригинал >
    Тренд NEAR после выпуска
     Бычий
    NEAR's seizure of defaulted assets is seen as morally correct, the controversy may end
  • Vini Barbosa |「 thecoding 」 Dev Educator B
     10.86K  @vinibarbosabr
    Unstoppable | Private Wallet D
     199.53K  @unstoppablebyhs

    @vinibarbosabr Near swaps are atomic (if you send funds you got something back or refund) but the 1-click API that most service providers use to integrate that service is permissioned. Without the 1-click API swap would not be as user friendly.

     18  4  1.94K
    Оригинал >
    Тренд NEAR после выпуска
     Нейтрально
    NEAR 交换原子化，但 1‑click API 受限，影响易用性
  • NEARWEEK DeFi_Expert OnChain_Analyst C
     79.12K  @NEARWEEK
    Bowen Wang D
     5.55K  @BowenWang18

    It is worth highlighting that the paper discusses the partial TEE case when the GPU is untrusted (no TEE inside GPU) and does not affect the approach of @near_ai where CPU and GPU TEE work together

     83  7  3.96K
    Оригинал >
    Тренд NEAR после выпуска
     Нейтрально
    NEAR AI employs CPU+GPU collaborative TEE, and an untrusted GPU does not affect it
  • CryptoHotep.eth 🛡️ TA_Analyst Educator C
     7.10K  @CryptoHotep

    2023 lows. $NEAR / @NEARProtocol https://t.co/x9Iidnc8HQ

     1  1  232
    Оригинал >
    Тренд NEAR после выпуска
     Чрезвычайно медвежий
    NEAR price broke below the accumulation zone, is in a downtrend channel, indicating an extremely bearish outlook.
  • NEAR Protocol Dev DeFi_Expert D
     1.85M  @NEARProtocol

    Intelligence, privacy and the open web converge at NEARCON in 9 days! Join us in San Francisco as founders, researchers and developers, build out an AI economy without compromise. Apply to attend: https://t.co/233Hh3mqSS https://t.co/5IqRIo87Xc

     300  12  9.19K
    Оригинал >
    Тренд NEAR после выпуска
     Бычий
    NEARCON conference will focus on the AI economy, driving the development of the NEAR ecosystem.